Filmmaker Denies Involvement in Bizarre Torrent Piracy Lawsuit
A federal copyright suit against private torrent sites faces contempt motions after the real filmmaker behind the cited works said an impostor filed the action.
By Sofia Lindqvist · September 9, 2026 · 1 min read
Published by Hollywood Tomorrow
A federal copyright infringement lawsuit targeting private torrent trackers has taken a surreal turn after the legitimate filmmaker whose work was cited in the complaint confirmed under oath that an impostor initiated the case.
Defense attorneys Erin Russell and Haley Finch, who represent the anonymous tracker operators, have formally asked the court to hold the purported plaintiff in contempt. As reported by TorrentFreak, the defense alleges the filer misrepresented his identity, asserted fraudulent copyright ownership over the films, and operated through a mail-drop address.
U.S. District Judge Andrea R. Wood had already moved the case onto a sanctions track and scheduled an in-person hearing following initial defense warnings regarding the plaintiff's identity.
## The True Rights Holder Steps Forward
To substantiate their claims, the defense team submitted a sworn declaration from Matthew A. Schneider of Ottawa, Ontario. Schneider is the director credited on IMDb for the three low-budget titles listed in the lawsuit: "Split: A Film Anthology," "Do Us Part," and "Orlando Gloom, Always the Same."
In his filing, the Canadian creator explained that he made the movies years ago with school friends under the banner Dirtbag Films. "I am not involved in, nor have I ever appeared in, this case. Furthermore, I do not know and am not associated with the person purporting to be “Matthew Schneider” in this case," the filmmaker stated, according to court documents cited by TorrentFreak. Filmmaking collaborator Solmund MacPherson also filed a declaration confirming the group never sold or assigned the rights to the movies.
## Why It Matters
Copyright enforcement against digital piracy networks often involves high-volume litigation and automated rights claims. If proven, the use of a real indie filmmaker's identity to stage unauthorized infringement lawsuits highlights significant procedural vulnerabilities in how digital rights actions can be brought before federal judges without preliminary verification.
Reported from the originating source.
Keep up with the industry
Join the morning memo for a short daily brief.
